About

Joseph Patrick Hougnon is a skilled negotiator and skilled legal professional in Sacramento, California, with nearly 30 years of revel in. Specializing in DUI Defense, Criminal Defense, and Administrative Professional Licensing Defense cases, he is devoted to providing non-public service and enthusiastic about defending his clients. After gaining treasured experience running for the Office of the Lawyer General and the Public Defender's Office, Joseph Patrick Hougnon graduated at the top of his law school elegance. In 1997, he opened his very own office in downtown Sacramento, in which he has been efficiently running his exercise ever due to the fact that. With a tune file of triumphing every case he has taken to trial in the past twenty years, Joseph Patrick Hougnon is devoted to protective his customers from the lifestyles-changing elements of crook expenses. He values his customers' accept as true with and works hard to communicate effectively, provide honest recommendation, and put together them for any potential results. As a devoted advise, Joseph Patrick Hougnon strives to alternate the final results of the instances he handles, mitigate provable cases, and safeguard his customers' destiny and livelihood to the quality of his ability.

Legal Issues

DUI & DWI

Criminal Law

Criminal Appeals, Drug Crimes, Expungement, Fraud, Gun Crimes, Internet Crimes, Sex Crimes, Theft, Violent Crimes

Gov & Administrative Law

Administrative Law

Certificates

No Certifications

Languages

• English: Spoken, Written

Accepted Jurisdictions

Experience

• Sole Practitioner
  Private Practice
  1997
• Lawyer
  Sacramento County Public Defender s Office
  1996
• Law Clerk
  State of California DOJ - Office of the Lawyer General
  1994

Education

Associations

Costs

• Free Consultancy Service
  Call me at (916) 730-5251 and I ll discuss your case with you in detail.
• Payment With Credit Card
  I accept all major credit cards
• Retaines and Rates
  For DUI s, I charge a lower up front fee than other Sacramento attorneys with my experience and skills. Why would I charge a client for a suppression motion (PC1538) for example before I review the evidence and make recommendations. I haven t lost a jury trial in 15 years, but only recommend trials when they make sense and my client has a good chance of prevailing.

Location